HotcryptoNews
  • Home
  • Activity
  • News
  • Article
  • About
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Register

HotcryptoNews

  • Home
  • Activity
  • News
  • Article
  • About
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Register
0

 

Article

How Cryptocurrency Projects Are Tackling Transparency and Security Problems

by Irene Loke July 16, 2019July 8, 2019
Posted by Irene Loke July 16, 2019July 8, 2019
How Cryptocurrency Projects Are Tackling Transparency and Security Problems

Article by Entrepreneur: Andrew Medal

I invested in BTC in 2010 (and sold shortly after, but have bought and sold all along since then), and have experienced a wild crypto ride. I’ve also advised and been working on a project that has developed the first application to bridge cryptocurrency with augmented reality.

I’ve seen the crypto market on both sides and witnessed the persistent problems of cryptocurrency exchanges, from hacks to insolvency. Institutions and mainstream investors are rightfully hesitant to engage with many exchanges, drawing from mainstream headlines such as the recent Binance hack to the tune of $40 million, as reported by CNBC.

The security woes of centralized exchanges are not the only prominent issue that makes investors and regulators uneasy. Bitfinex’s recent misleading of investors about $850 million locked up, as reported by Coin Desk, with a shady capital firm and the bizarre and ongoing debacle of QuadrigaCX are only a recent spate in a long history of cryptocurrency exchanges mired in dilemmas.

Fortunately, the problems of exchanges are well-known, and many projects, even some exchanges themselves, are working toward providing better trust, transparency and security.

Improving transparency

One of the core problems with cryptocurrency exchanges, aptly demonstrated by both QuadrigaCX and Bitfinex, is transparency.

QuadrigaCX was not solvent, and the exchange’s owner was actively siphoning his own funds into customer withdrawals to appear solvent to the customers before his untimely death. Bitfinex, who dipped into its closely-related firm Tether’s reserves to cover an inaccessible $850 million of its funds, failed to disclose this information to customers — and subsequently led to the New York Attorney General filing an injunction against it.

Add in the notion that the vast majority of cryptocurrency exchange actively engage in wash trading and report fake volumes, and transparency clearly is a cardinal issue in the exchange ecosystem.

Transparency primarily involves two areas: proof of solvency and proof of legitimate trading volumes. Proof of solvency is critical because investors need to know the risk of engaging with a financial entity that holds their funds. However, the issue that exchanges take with this is that they do not want to publicly disclose the financial details of their internal operations.

While various degrees of “proof of solvency” has been speculated as a potential scaling advantage for Bitcoin as well, some intriguing technical advances have produced promising glimpses of provable exchange reserves that remain private.

For example, Blockstream — a leading Bitcoin development company — announced its standardized tool for ensuring exchange solvency called “proof of reserves” earlier this year. Essentially, an exchange can prove their reserves of BTC without publicly moving or spending the reserves through generating an extra valid input with a transaction of their total reserves.

All of the UTXOs would consequently become verifiable under the exchange’s ownership without them risking moving the funds since the network would reject the transaction.

However, Blockstream’s proof of reserves still does not preserve privacy entirely, and their team is working on solutions to mask the value of the exchange UTXOs, which would be publicly available.

Other solutions, such as Arpa, take privacy as the foremost consideration. Arpa relies on a fascinating subfield of cryptography called secure multi-party computation, which applied to exchanges, would enable them to jointly compute the average solvency of their exchanges without actually exposing the full solvency data to competitors.

“ARPA’s cutting-edge cryptographic multiparty computation (MPC) disrupts the traditional way of using data, enables privacy-preserving computation or joint analysis of secret data, and replaces trusted data aggregator that captures the most out of the current data value chain, ” as explained by Arpa founder Felix Xu on its site. “Dapps built on ARPA layer 2 solutions across industries like finance, insurance, healthcare and even personal data wallet for secure data exchange and monetization.”

Some exchanges, including Poloniex (owned by Circle), have even begun publishing quarterly reports to provide better assurances of solvency to investors.

Gemini, who also produces the Gemini Dollars stablecoin, has continually emphasized their close relationship with the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYSDFS) to assure investors of both their solvency and legitimacy. And the exchange provides the issuer, banking and security audit information for the Gemini Dollar stablecoin.

Considering the lack of regulatory control over many exchanges located in obscure jurisdictions and their unwillingness to provide better transparency due to the “dark underbelly” money machine, tools such as BTI and Messari 10 can provide better information to investors.

Unfortunately, they still will not solve the fake volumes predicament among exchanges.

Removing centralized custody

Many initiatives in the cryptocurrency sector strive to remove centralized exchanges entirely, or at the very least, their custody. Exchange custody over user funds is an established security threat, and a new generation of trust-minimizing technology and P2P exchanges are working on circumventing centralized custody of funds.

Projects such as Atomic Wallet, a cryptocurrency wallet, focus on deploying a technology called Atomic Swaps. Atomic swaps enable users to exchange assets without third-party custodians ever taking control. The process is entirely P2P and supports cross-chain (i.e., Bitcoin to Ethereum) swaps.

The type of interoperability afforded by atomic swaps is a prevailing trend in the broader cryptocurrency community as well. As more cryptocurrency networks launch looking to provide better scalability, interoperability is also becoming a significant consideration.

Some projects even bypass custody altogether by both users or exchanges. For example, Morpher is a virtual trading platform where users speculate on the market of the underlying asset via Ethereum smart contracts. Smart contracts mint and burn the Morpher token based on the performance of the underlying asset represented by the contract.

As a result, there are no fees and there is theoretically limitless liquidity for any type of market, considering the Morpher token can “morph” into any type of asset. According to Morpher: “If the underlying market gains in value, the smart contract issues new coins to the investor proportionally. If the underlying loses, staked coins are destroyed proportionally.”

The idea of P2P exchanges has also been gaining traction recently, although decentralized exchanges (DEXs) and P2P marketplaces have been around in the crypto sphere for several years.

Traditionally, the problem of P2P marketplaces and DEXs is that their liquidity is insufficient compared to their centralized counterparts, largely excluding them from the partialities of traders.

Despite this, some P2P marketplaces such as Bisq are quickly gathering momentum — in both users and volume. Particularly in economically destitute regions, such as Venezuela, P2P marketplaces such as LocalBitcoins, as reported by Coin Dance, are invaluable to pegging in and out of a store of value when the Bolivar has become effectively worthless.

P2P marketplaces and DEXs still have a long way to go in reaching an optimal level of liquidity but, parallel to the rise of scalability and interoperability, should start becoming more popular among investors in the coming years.

Even some centralized exchanges, such as Binance, are exploring DEXs. Binance’s DEX launched last month, and although it is yet to be seen just how decentralized it will be, it is indicative of Binance’s recognition of the larger trend at hand — users want custody over their funds because they don’t trust exchanges.

The implicit nature of trust makes trusting exchanges all the more difficult considering their history peppered with controversy, but at least projects and the overall industry are beginning to take a hard look at how to improve transparency and remove the need for custody of user funds.

cryptocurrencysecuritytransparency
0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
Irene Loke

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

previous post
How to Easily Start Investing in Bitcoin and Cryptocurrencies
next post
Can Machines And Blockchain Solve Human Trust Bias?

related articles

The Irony: Jamie Dimon Believes JPM Coin Could...

February 28, 2019

Ontology August Q&A Addressed Questions On Technology, Consensus,...

August 22, 2018

Coinone Transfer Chooses RippleNet for Its Latest App

December 15, 2018

Motivated And Trained, Generation Blockchain Is Preparing To...

March 22, 2019

DJ Khaled and Floyd Mayweather Sued Over Involvement...

October 24, 2018

This Tech Lets You Send Any Cryptocurrency to...

September 10, 2018

New Bank of Israel Report Recommends Against Creating...

November 8, 2018

Fidelity Cryptocurrency Platform Enters ‘Final Testing’ Stages

February 2, 2019

This DEX Is Enabling Payments in Any Ethereum...

September 19, 2018

Coinbase Just Paid a $30K Bounty for the...

February 15, 2019





# Name Price Market Cap Change Price Graph (24h)

Recent Posts

  • What Twitter Meme Wars Say About Crypto’s Reliance on Figureheads
  • Sri Lanka’s Central Bank Calls for Blockchain-Based KYC Proposals
  • Showing Interest in ETP Tied to Binance Coin, Amun Says
  • State Street Slashes DLT Developer Team as Bank Rethinks Blockchain Strategy
  • Is Technical Analysis Prophetic or Preposterous? We Asked 7 Crypto Traders

Archives

  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • January 2018
  • July 2017

Recent Posts

  • What Twitter Meme Wars Say About Crypto’s Reliance on Figureheads

    December 5, 2019
  • Sri Lanka’s Central Bank Calls for Blockchain-Based KYC Proposals

    December 4, 2019
  • Showing Interest in ETP Tied to Binance Coin, Amun Says

    December 4, 2019

Facebook Feed

Facebook

Categories

  • Activity
  • Article
  • Bitcoin
  • Editors' Choice
  • Event
  • Latest News
  • News
  • Uncategorized
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Email

@2018 - HotcryptoNews. All Right Reserved.